During this week’s class, I have to admit that I found myself giggling a lot. This had nothing to do with Dr. Van Noordt because I thought she did a FANTASTIC job. I was giggling because I found it a bit funny that we spent 3 hours analyzing “Endgame” by Beckett.
I was reminded of an activity that I did a year ago with one of the classes I teach. It was an AP Spanish Language class and it was during May, after they had already taken the AP Exam. We had been working extremely hard up to that point, so we were a bit relieved, and worn out, after the test had been taken. You know the feeling. It is that gigantic sigh of relief where exhaustion and insanity hit you. Basically, I was at the point where my brain had reached its maximum temporal capacity and I was kind of in a surreal, delirious, on-the-verge-of-a-nervous-breakdown state. In other words, my brain went nuts for the day. So, I decided to have some fun and wrote down the most random nonsense on the board. Now, at the time I thought this was hilarious, but now looking back, I realize that I should have gotten more sleep ;) Anyways, I wrote down this babble on the board in the form of a poem. I then told my students, in a very serious voice, that this was called “abstract poetry.” The students were then to attempt to make sense of the poem and share their interpretations with the class. This lasted about 5 minutes, as I just couldn’t hold in my laughter any longer. Finally, I told them that I had simply written down arbitrary nonsense and they all started laughing hysterically as they, too, had gone insane. Then, they decided to write their own abstract poem, and it was actually kind of fun… and I am sure there is a lesson in their somewhere. If not, oh well because we needed a break.
Ok, so the point of this embarrassing story is that sometimes I wonder if we have a tendency to overanalyze things. Sometimes in my crazy head, when I am not daydreaming about new salsa dance moves, I fantasize about writing a “profound” novel or essay just for the heck of it. Then I wonder about how people will analyze my work and try to better understand my “message.” I’d probably find it amusing. Or maybe someone could actually figure me out, in which case I wish they could let me know what they find!
It sort of reminds me of that famous artist who wrote his name on a toilet bowl just to see if people truly appreciated his art, or if it was just his name that attracted them. Well, the toilet bowl is now in the Centre Pompidou in Paris, so obviously it was considered to be an amazing piece of inspirational art!
I enjoyed “Endgame.” I could sit here and analyze it and try to interpret its message, but I question if there really is one. Maybe Beckett just wanted to write a crazy play, and played with language and common themes that people are familiar with because he knew we would try to make connections. Maybe he just wanted to see what nonsense we could come up with… or maybe he wanted us to get what we, personally, wanted out of it. Or better yet, perhaps the reaction we have is the art. I don’t know. Sometimes, I think Beckett is somewhere laughing at us. I have to admit, I may join him in his absurdity and laughter. Earth can definitely be amusing... or depressing.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
Your ideas about endgame totally ring true for me. I think that it is important to take a look at the existentialism movement so that we can understand it somewhat and be more knowledgeable about literature as a whole. On the other hand, I felt that the discussion went on and on and on and we didn't get much farther than all this leads to nothing. I think Beckett does a nice job playing with words and ideas but he also plays with our minds, doesn't he? Watching the play clip was beneficial but not entertaining for me. At least you could find some humor in it, and I think that to some degree you are right about Beckett. He must be laughing himself about all of the silly theories people come up with to understand something that is not meant to be resolved.
My post on Endgame was full of random thoughts for much the same reason. I think Beckett was definitely playing around with the reader, as well as language. As far as the class discussion, I think it all has to be taken with a grain of salt. It is certainly possible to over-analyze. I think the whole point, though, was precisely that you can read into it whatever you want to since... absurdity is the name of the game.
I liked your anecdote about your class. That's hilarious. I might try that myself one day for some comic relief!
Fun post, but you're on the wrong track with your claims about over-analyzing. The issue is not overanalyzing. The issue is good analysis or lousy analysis. Endgame is understandable and analyzable through modernist and avant garde frames; it is not dissimilar to other modernist works. Literature is not crazy or random. Same goes for the toilet bowl art piece, and other pieces of surrealist art. The avant garde always had a meaning behind its experiments.
Leave authorial intent behind. It will get in your way if it becomes a pretext for not analyzing!
Who knows where to download XRumer 5.0 Palladium?
Help, please. All recommend this program to effectively advertise on the Internet, this is the best program!
How I can download documents from WikiLeaks?
By the way, anybody home?!
Post a Comment